Connect with us

Opinion

XRP: FOX Business Senior Correspondent Says SEC Is Losing Its Lawsuit Against Ripple

Published

on

On Wednesday (July 20), American lawyer John Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1 on Twitter), the owner of the Deaton Law Firm (which is based in East Providence, Rhode Island), who has been closely following and commentating on the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple, explained to Fox Business why the SEC is angry with him.

Deaton is also the founder of the website CryptoLaw, which “was launched in 2021 to be a clearinghouse of information, news and analysis on key U.S. legal and regulatory developments for digital asset holders”, as well as the host of the YouTube channel CryptoLaw.

As you may remember, on 22 December 2020, the SEC announced that it had “filed an action against Ripple Labs Inc. and two of its executives, who are also significant security holders, alleging that they raised over $1.3 billion through an unregistered, ongoing digital asset securities offering.” Essentially, the SEC is arguing that XRP is a security under U.S. federal securities laws.

On Tuesday (July 19), the New York Regional Office of the SEC filed a letter (dated June 7) addressed to U.S. District Judge Hon. Analisa Torres, in which the SEC said it “opposes six XRP investors”… motion to file an amicus brief regarding the opinions of one of the SEC’s experts.” The SEC went on to say that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York should deny this motion and “prohibit Deaton from any further participation in these proceedings.”

Deaton’s comments were made during an interview with Fox Business Senior Correspondent Charlie Gasparino on “The Claman Countdown” show (which is hosted by Liz Claman).

Gasparino wanted to know why the SEC is so upset with Deaton.

Deaton replied:

It’s crazy times… I made a YouTube video where I did a satirical mock cross examination of former chairman Clayton, and I infused scenes from [the movie] “My Cousin Vinny”.

And I tweeted a few things that were harsh criticism, and they told the judge that I shouldn’t be granted amicus status because of that. She rejected those views, granted me amicus status and, lo and behold, now they’re arguing that I should be thrown off the case.

Later in the conversation, Gasparino said that the SEC is “losing the case,” and asked Deaton what is the next step.

Deaton said:

Next month is due for summary judgements. That’s where each side tries to get a complete victory. The judge decides one way or the other, or she might decide that a jury has to issue certain factors, but you’re right Charlie. A lot is at stake because the SEC has come out and argued that the token itself — not just the way Ripple sells it — but that if anyone in the United States sells XRP, they’re violating section five. So, if the SEC were to get its way and deem XRP a security, the token itself, then every altcoin on the market including Ethereum would be in play for the SEC to get their hands on.

The interview ended with Deaton saying that he had until Monday (July 25) to give his response to the SEC and that “hopefully, the judge within a week will give a decision.”

Opinion

CBDCs are worse than bank accounts, according to Adam Back

Published

on

Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, said that CBDCs are worse than the current monetary system and underlines the importance of Bitcoin.

Adam Back, a Bitcoin “OG”

Adam Back is CEO of Blockstream, a company that collaborates with the development of Bitcoin and related solutions, such as the Lightning Network, for example.

The CEO has been involved with Bitcoin since its inception, being a well-known member of the Cypherpunk email list that spawned the whitepaper, and has always been very active in the discussions, decisions, and developments that made Bitcoin is today.

Adam Back was one of the great leaders during the “Fork Wars”, when the creation of Bitcoin Cash took place, and one of the most enthusiastic against increasing the size of the blocks, arguing that it could harm the decentralization of the net. Back personally spoke with several major miners to further validate the Bitcoin Core network, led by Blockstream.

CBDC is worse than what we have today

With the growing interest in central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), many countries have mobilized through their monetary authorities, partnering with banks, fintechs, and even cryptocurrency projects to build this new form of money.

China, South Korea, Japan and India have been leading this movement, with pilot projects already fully operational or in the testing phase, moving ever closer to official launch.

The UK, US and Mexico are at an even earlier stage, in the research and development phase of centralized digital currencies.

But is this “solution” really positive for people?

According to Adam Back, CBDCs are worse than what we have today, in our current system where cash is controlled by central banks and digital money is already dominated by corporate cartels from banks, fintechs and governments around the world.

“Stablecoins > CDBC. in fact CDBCs are systems of control, worse than bank accounts, certainly worse than paper cash, worse than stable coins, and much worse than #bitcoin.”

The apolitical characteristic of Bitcoin stands out, since it is a decentralized currency, not subject to the control or arbitrary will of governments.

With the existence of a centralized digital currency, the tracking, surveillance and control of user funds (you and me) is just a button away from the politicians who change every four years in our electoral system.

With the implementation of this technology, these politicians can more easily enforce their decisions, leaving little or no way for people to protect themselves from authoritarian or tyrannical actions. Political enemies would be easily neutralized through money.

CBDC is worse than what we have today and that is why the adoption of decentralized, self-sovereign, unauthorized money is of paramount importance for the years to come.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Vitalik Buterin speaks out against invasion of Ukraine and calls military action a “crime”

Published

on

Following the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, criticized that act calling it a “crime against the Ukrainian and Russian people.” Despite being born in Russia, the 28-year-old programmer ended his statement by saying, “Glory to Ukraine.”

In his most recent tweet, Vitalik Buterin said he is “very upset” about Vladimir Putin’s decision to go to war against Ukraine.

In his opinion, the military operation will have devastating consequences for both Ukrainian and Russian citizens.

The Ethereum co-creator is also pessimistic that the conflict will be resolved diplomatically. “I know there will be no security,” he predicted gloomily.

Born in Russia, Buterin seems to oppose his homeland in this war dispute and adds “Glory to Ukraine” at the end of his tweet. He further stated that while Ethereum is neutral, he is not.

The growing tension between the two nations has caused major disruption in the financial and cryptocurrency markets

Bitcoin, for example, plummeted to nearly $34,000, while most altcoins are also in the red.

The market capitalization of the digital asset market fell below $1.6 trillion, which means it has declined by approximately $200 billion since yesterday.

For his part, U.S. President Joe Biden called Russia’s attack “unprovoked and unjustified.” He also warned Putin of “further consequences” if the aggression is not stopped soon.

Boris Johnson, the UK prime minister, also backed Ukraine. He said Britain will provide a military support package to the attacked nation and impose tough sanctions on Russia.

Continue Reading

Bitcoin News

India’s central bank and finance ministry agree on new rules for cryptocurrencies

Published

on

The country’s finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, said the finance ministry and the Reserve Bank of India, RBI, are in agreement with the new rules for cryptocurrencies framed in the budget proposal and including taxes.

“The RBI and the government are in agreement. Discussions are ongoing. Even before the budget discussions were ongoing and will continue. Whatever discussion the government or the Reserve Bank takes, it happens only after discussions between them,” Sitharaman told a press conference after addressing the RBI central board.

He added:

“We were all having discussions before the budget. And we will continue to have the discussions. And whatever decisions are taken on this, obviously because it has a very serious problem, it’s a central bank digital currency of some kind, of some form, some shape, some color, some description, so obviously it will be because we both have had enough consultations.”

New rules in India

India’s new crypto rules, expected to be formalized in March, were announced as part of the annual budget speech on Feb. 1.

The proposals include a 30% tax on any income from the transfer of virtual digital assets, a first for the nation. In addition, a deadline is given for introducing the digital rupee (the central bank digital currency, CBDC, India) by April 2023 and a 1 %. tax deducted at source (TDS) on any transaction.

With these new statements, the minister downplayed any concerns about a difference of opinion between the central bank and the ministry. He added that we have been “respecting each other’s domain, also knowing what we have to do with each other’s priorities and in the interest of the nation.”

Continue Reading

Trending